Australian are fooled, cheated by governing authorities for a Century by altering/amending rules/laws and constitution as they wish, as per their convince.
The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1901 (Appendix 10), as well as rectifying the correct government system, the “Westminster” system, which would then make all legislation, agreements and contracts drawn up by these governments since 1901 null and void.
1908 – The then parliament notes that votes are spread too widely across too many candidates (aka the Will of the People to choose the Candidate most suited to govern at their Will) so they decided to create the two party preferred voting system. Fact – We did not consent – Australian history shows that We the People of Australia have paid a very high price for the Treason and Treachery of the “Political Bird” We now know as the Australian Government Corporation.
1919 – Treaty of Versailles, In an Explanatory Statement, (Appendix 4), from Sir Harry Talbot Gibbs he states “Australia made an international declaration of its intention to become a sovereign nation when the then Prime Minister Hughes and his deputy, Sir Joseph Cook, signed the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919. On its cognizance of signing this treaty, Australia was granted a “C” class League of Nations mandate over former German territories in the Pacific. In effect, they believed that they were making Australia a sovereign nation without the public consent”. He also went on to say in this statement “I therefore have come to the conclusion that the current legal and political system in Australia and it’s States and territories has no basis in Law”. Fact – We did not consent – The referendum (Appendix 9) for public consent was not carried and therefore the people said “NO” and they tried to make us independent while remaining under the Empire.
1966 – The Coin of the Realm, the British Pound is removed and replaced by Decimal currency – a Fiat currency with questionable ownership. Fact – We did not consent – Our original true Commonwealth of Australia 1901 Constitution specifically states that our currency is the British Pound. Have a look at where our so-called fiat currency is now.
1973 – The Whitlam Government Unlawfully passes the Acts Amendments Act 1985 (Appendix 5) and the Royal Style and Titles Act 1973 (Appendix 11) to create the fictitious Queen of Australia. They then created the Australian Government Corporation a USA registered corporation. There was no provision in the Original 1901 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (Appendix 10) for creating a new “Head of State”. With the Queen of Australia being a fictitious person and all people taking office in Australia in differing roles, i.e. The Governor-General, State Governors, Politicians, Judges, Lawyers, Police etc, are all illegal because their Oaths should have been sworn under Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth 2 of England not the “Queen of Australia”. Therefore, any laws, legislation, or appointments made since the initiation of the Queen of Australia must be deemed NULL and VOID and therefore illegal legislation such as the Australia Act 1986 is also illegal. The former Senator Rod Cullerton also had corresponded with The Governor-General requesting that he answered in writing to disclose the tenets of Office that he holds, (Appendix 2), and to this day there has been no response from the Governor-General. Fact – We did not consent – There was NO Referendum for any of these changes initialised by these corrupt politicians. So Australia as we know it is now a conglomerate of Corporations and subsidiaries under the Australian Government Corporation and the Queen of Australia that reigns terror over the people and has total control of all aspects of governance with the people having no say at all.
1975 – The Lima Declaration, was signed by Labor Senator Don Willesee, at the Second General Conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO) that met in Lima, Peru, during the period 12-26 March 1975. Senator Button, from the ALP said “We have to restructure Australian primary and secondary Industries to amalgamate into a new economic international order”. The resulting declaration had disastrous ramifications for Australian industry. The basic reasoning behind the Declaration was that the drastic plight of the Third World was the result of the rapacious policies of the advanced industrial nations. Australia listed as one of these. The only way to rectify the situation was to transfer industrial resources from advanced countries like Australia to the Third World, then to provide markets for Third World exports by buying products once produced locally. Both major parties are equally to blame for betraying the nation. The Fraser Government took over where Whitlam left off, Hawke and Keating increased the tempo of the programme with Mr Hawke, Keating, Button and other senior ministers telling unsuspecting Australians they were working to ‘internationalise’ the Australian economy. The truth is, they were sowing the seeds that has almost decimated Australian manufacturing and industry and has seen Australian jobs disappear overseas. Means by which Australia pursues this objective include the Australian System of Tariff Preferences, the foreign aid program, and involvement in a range of activities under the auspices of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO) and the Commonwealth Heads of Government Regional Meeting (CHOGRM) Working Group on Industry.
1986 – The Hawke Government Unlawfully passes the Australia Act 1986, which is the final action, required to completely remove Australia from the British Commonwealth. The Australia Act 1986(Appendix 7) and the following Reprints Act 1992 Queensland (Appendix 8) allows government to make laws without the consent of the people. The only true constitution is the Original Constitution of Australia 1901, which in its opening statement states “The people have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Constitution hereby established”, therefore, it created the Commonwealth of Australia in its opening statement. This definition states that “The people under this constitution ARE the Commonwealth of Australia” and this is why there can be NO change to the Constitution or the Constitutional Arrangements without the consent of the PEOPLE! A list of referendums in Australia since the original constitution of 1901 is as follows in (Appendix 9). That is why anyone promoting a hidden agenda, that is alien to that of the constitution, must find Alternative means of achieving that agenda to bypass an impenetrable safeguard of the people’s rights, impenetrable because it is “Of The People”. This is also, why Bob Hawke brought in the Australia Act to veil the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, which would cover up Whitlam’s crime of using the Statute Law Revision Act 1973 to remove the words “The Commonwealth of” and “Of the Commonwealth” from all Federal Legislation to create an independent pseudo nation called “Australia”.
This created “Australia” a simulated fake nation with no people, how could there be any people when they are all in the Commonwealth of Australia? In addition, no assets because these all belonged to the people – The Commonwealth of Australia, but that didn’t matter because the name “Australia” has been in common use forever, which was an excellent decoy to the Commonwealth of Australia. It was the “Alternative Means” that Bob Hawke was looking for. Therefore, we must ask the question “Is it Valid?” Firstly, to ascertain this lets apply the “Rule of Law”, in the first instance this suggests an offence, Treachery, against the Commonwealth. The Crimes Act 1914 section 24AA “Treachery” states:” A person shall not do any act or thing with intent: (i) to overthrow the Constitution of the Commonwealth. This is covered in today’s Criminal Code Act 1995 Section 80.1AC which states: “A person commits an offence if: (c) the person engages in the conduct with the intention of overthrowing: (i) the Constitution. The penalty in 1914 and still now for the offence of Treachery is “Imprisonment for Life”.
Secondly, no valid change can be made to the Constitution without the consent of the people. To get this Act into effect all of the State Parliaments had to enact the “Australia Acts Request Act” yet there was NO referendum held in any State nevertheless, each State passed an Australia Acts Requests Act in 1985. The Prime Minister, Bob Hawke and the Premiers of each State conspired against the Commonwealth “The People”. Thirdly, Former Justice of the High Court, Michael Kirby AC CMG has argued that the Australia Act 1986 (Cth) is invalid. Former Justice Kirby stated that because the Australia Act contained amendments to the State Constitutions of Queensland and Western Australia it is inconsistent with section 106 of the constitution and is not a valid exercise of Commonwealth legislative power.
Finally, the states could not validly enact the Australia Act Request Act 1985 because: (a) No referendum was held in any state, and (b) Each Australia Act Request Act INVALIDATED itself at its First Schedule Section 5(b), example (Appendix 5) and could not be lawfully used to support the enactment of the Australia Act. Section 5 limits the “Legislative powers of Parliaments of States” granted in Section 2 and clearly states that these powers “do not operate so as to give any force or effect to a provision of an Act that is repugnant to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act”. However, the aim of each Australia Acts Request Act is deleterious to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act. This makes the Australia Acts Request Acts REPUGNANT to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.
Then by the provision at Section 5 of their own First Schedule, the Australia Acts Request Acts are INVALID! Reference to the LACK of a REFERENDUM in respect of the Australia Acts Request Act means that protocol was not followed. In the Australia Act at Section 6 it states: “A law made by the Parliament of the State shall be of no force or effect unless it is made in such manner and form as may from time to time be required by a law made by that Parliament, whether made before or after the commencement of this Act”. In other words such a law is Invalid if it is not made in the manner and form required by a law made by that Parliament. This was entrenched in the constitution of Queensland, by Section 53 and others, before and after the enactment of the Australia Acts Request Act 1985.
In respect to Queensland, its legislation clearly set out such Manner and Form including the need for a referendum. Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen said in a speech recorded in Hansard (Qld) on 07-12-1977 “Only if the people of Queensland vote for a change will it be possible for Australia as a whole to become a Republic, because you cannot change the monarchy in one part of Australia, unless you change it in the whole. To entrench the present system, the bill provides that none of its clauses can be altered by Parliament unless the Bill is first presented to the people by way of referendum as prescribed in this Bill.
The requirement of entrenchment (Section 53) is also itself entrenched so that the guarantee cannot be undone, such as has been done in other parts of the Commonwealth of Nations where a republican form of government has been brought about contrary to the Constitution”. It is obvious then that the failure by Queensland Parliament to uphold correct Manner and Form, in respect of the enactment of the Australia Acts Request act 1985 Invalidates that Act. To further show this Act to be invalid we must look into the actions of Peter Beattie when he then replaced the Queensland Constitution 1867 with the new Queensland Constitution 2001. Peter Beattie justified this to Parliament by telling them “That it was to Consolidate and Modernise the Queensland Constitution to bring it into the Modern Era”, no one in the house questioned him and nobody told the people. Here is how he did it: He designed the new Constitution to be UNNOTICEABLE especially in fundamental Legislation. This included not having anything in it that would be seen as confrontational so “NOTATIONS” were used. For example, removing the right of Referendum would be very confrontational wouldn’t it? So, the first thing that was done was removal on the FIRST PAGE of the following:
“The requirements of Referendum established under the: Constitution Act 1867, Constitution Act Amendment Act 1890 and Constitution Act Amendment Act 1934. If we now look at Section 3 of the Queensland Constitution 2001, we see that the Purpose of the Act is: “This Act declares, consolidates and modernises the Constitution of Queensland. Then, this is followed by a NOTE that states: “However, this Act does not consolidate the following Constitutional provisions because of the special additional procedures, including approval by the majority of electors at a referendum, that may be required – Constitution Act 1867, Sections 1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B and 53, Constitution Act Amendment Act 1890 Section 2 and Constitution Act Amendment Act 1934 Sections 3 and 4. Further, this Act does not consolidate the Constitution Act 1867, Sections 30 and 40.
However, you may well say that this is only a note until you refer to Section 5: Note in text is part of this Act which states: “A note in the text of this Act is part of this Act which clearly is here to give full effect to Section 3 which was just referred to. This leads us to realise that the purpose of this Act has been misstated. It should refer to the removal of Constitutional Provisions that include “Approval by the Majority of Electors at a Referendum” as granted to the People of Queensland by the valid Constitution of Queensland 1867. Saying this then how do the words “Declare, Consolidate and Modernise, the Constitution of Queensland” apply? Instead, you could use the following words “Stealth, Deceit and Treachery against the people of Queensland in their place that would be more appropriate in this case. For instance, refer to Section 95 of this 2001 Queensland Constitution that lists the Legislation “Repeals” by this Constitution at Schedule 3 and looking down the list of repealed Legislation we find the “Australia Acts Request Act 1985 No.69 (Appendix 5).
This Legislation did it’s job in 1986 when the Australia Act 1986 was enacted so, why repeal it and why create Reprints, under The reprints Act 1992, an Act that was created to change Legislation at will, of the Australia Acts Request act 1985 on 19-07-1994 and 06-06-2002 then repeal it on the 06-06-2002? It seems pointless rewriting a Law and effecting change to it when it has no further effect.
Why repeal it unless there was something to hide?
So what was done to it before it was repealed? We have already seen that this Act invalidated itself at Section 5 in Schedule 1 but there was no change to Section 5. The most important change was in the Preamble, which was entirely removed which makes a nonsense of this Act.
In the original wording of the Australia Acts Request act 1985, (Appendix 5), it contains a Preamble of 5 paragraphs, where each of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th paragraphs are reiterated in kind at sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Act. At first glance, the omission of the first four paragraphs may suggest that the Act has merely undergone a tidying up. The definition above the Preamble is similar to the first paragraph except it names those responsible for initiating the need for this Act. So why would you bother when the Act had done its job and cannot be used again? Unless it is necessary to remove something that may be incriminating, such as the 5th paragraph.
The 5th paragraph states: “BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same as follows:-
“ What we have here in the 5th paragraph is:
(a)This is the clause that ENACTS this Legislative Bill,
(b) It tells us WHO Enacted the Bill, and (c) Under WHOSE AUTHORITY, it was Enacted. Paragraph 5 creates the Act, which is presented for Assent, so, without paragraph 5, the Bill remains a Bill and is not a VALID Act of Legislation.
** By removing this Enactment Clause from the Australia Acts Request Act 1985 it becomes INVALID, it is NOT INACTED and it is NOT AUTHORISED which then INVALIDATES the Australia Act 1986. **
Then, because the Australia Acts Request Act is invalid, the Federal Government under Bob Hawke had no right to invoke Section 51 of the Commonwealth Constitution as not all of the States had made a valid request for a change in legislation. The result is there were NO valid grounds for the Australia Act to be enacted. Consent of the people must be sought through a Referendum! Therefore, John Howard held a referendum to ask the public if they wanted to be a republic on 06-11-1999 (Appendix 9) but it was defeated, the Australian People did NOT consent! Therefore, it was never the wish of the Australian public to go down the path that Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke and Keating had pushed onto the public.
Fact – We did not consent – Our Australia and we the People of Australia are now completely Centralized and Corporatised by the Australian Government Corporation and there was NO referendum to request the consent of the people for these changes.
1986 – Parliament removes Our Lawful Constitution consisting of its Preamble clauses 1 to 9 and the eight Lawful S128 changes since inception on 1st January 1901 and replaces it with their corporate version. Fact – We did not consent – This Act of Treason against Australia and the Australian People was and remains Unlawful and Unconstitutional and therefore the Parliaments Courts, Judiciary, Police even State so-called etc have no Authority whatsoever under any Lawful or Constitutional. Speed forward to the 1990s and beyond Aged pensioners Veterans and other vulnerable Australians became the new poor and now in 2021 barely exist well below the poverty line.
1992 – Reprints Act 1992: The end of democracy in each Australian State! This is an Act, which allows a law to be amended, by the omission or insertion of provisions, or by the changing of words to change the meaning, the interpretation and/or the EFFECT of the LAW through the covert process of REPRINTING! Fact – We did not consent – This Act of Treason against the Australian People in each State is and remains Unlawful and Unconstitutional under the Reprints Act 1992 and therefore the People in each state have no say at all in laws that are created or changed.
These changes are done in stealth and the public does not even know that the changes have been made. Therefore, each state government has total control over laws irrespective of the effect that those laws have on the public. This is totalitarian control over the public in retrospect making each Premier a dictator in his or her own right. In Queensland, for example, Peter Beattie continued preparation for a separatist State throughout the Goss – Rudd era (1989 – 1995) and Borbidge’s Term in office (1995 – 1998) which allowed him to then put into effect that separatist State utilising the ILLEGAL Australia Act and legislation prepared for the framing of a Republic. One of his priorities was to remove the 1867 Constitution of Queensland and replace it with the illegal Constitution of Queensland 2001, which he did.
2020 – Banking Amendment (Deposits) Bill 2020 aka Bail In Law. Fact – We were conned – it will allow the banks to declare a financial emergency and take bank deposits of every Australian and give back *shares as reimbursement. *In the event of a financial emergency, the bank’s shares would have already been suspended from trading. The bank’s shares would be worthless pieces of paper and would remain so for many years. Fact – We will be Robbed – Our money is not safe in their banks and Our Sovereignty Personal, Economical, Digital and Financial were stolen from us by politicians way back in the 1930s and 40’s when Australia truly was the lucky country and as We now know especially so for Politicians and Political Parties.
2022 – Federal Voting Count Fraud, The government failed to make sure that the Great seal of the Commonwealth was included on all Writs issued for the last Federal election 2022. Former senator Rod Cullerton has made a formal complaint against the Chief Legal officer, Mr Andrew Johnson, and against the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) for Unlawful pretence of office for federal elections 2022 (Appendix 6). This makes that election result fraudulent and therefore the result is a non-event where the corrupt political parties that have been ruling this country for too long under a corrupt Constitution, the Australia Act 1986, have conned the people of Australia by rigging this election and not holding it under the lawful constitutional practices for an election process.
2023 – As part of the Australian Government’s commitment to implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart, a referendum will be held on 14 October 2023. Australians will be asked whether to change the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice.
Holding a Voice referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament on the anniversary of the 1967 referendum is a backwards and retrograde step which will destroy the progress to racial equality started in 1967 and divide Australians by race forever. The government must not ask Australians to divide themselves by race. Even just asking the question will forever divide Australians on racial grounds.
Inserting an Indigenous-only body into the constitution would be illiberal, divisive, undemocratic, and violate the egalitarian principle of racial equality under the law
Conclusion:
The events listed above lay solid grounds for immediate action against those that have chosen, over many decades, to deceive the Australian public and rob them of many rights that were rightfully theirs under, the only legal Constitution since Federation, the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1901. Therefore, it is only right, even though it was the responsibility of your predecessors to fix these Treacherous acts against Australian citizens, that the onus now falls on the current Federal Police, the Federal Attorney General, the DPP and the Justices of the High Court to make this unlawful situation right and restore the full rights back to the people of Australia by restoring our true constitution, The Constitution of Australia 1901.
Irrespective of whether you swore your oath of service to the Queen of England as per our constitution or the illegal fictitious Queen of Australia, which would make all of those as illegal in their current jobs or positions, you must put that aside and follow the legal constitution and original rights of the people to have all of you serve them and rectify the current illegal governments and legislation. If you all fail to act then you are declaring that you are also siding with the criminal entities that have stolen our nation and will be treated as such facing arrest and prosecution as well. All guilty parties, including the politicians and political parties, the bureaucrats in governing bodies and bureaucrats in the government departments, as well as any other foreign bodies or organisations that have played any part in these criminal acts,
Treachery/Treason must be de-registered immediately. New governance then should commence with the restoration of the Constitutional changes to our original Constitution.